I'm a little confused about /Tcomma and /Tcedilla
According to Adobe Latin 3:
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/latin_charsets/Adobe_Latin_3.html
Why are they are using the /Tcommaaccent "name" for the cedilla glyph? Is there any reason for that? or it's just a bug?
When consulting the Unicode chart, I see "commas" on both glyphs...
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/162/index.htm
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/21a/index.htm
The only difference is that the first shows a Sans font, and the second one shows a Serif font.
So far I have been using:
/uni0162 0162 for Tcedilla
/uni021A 021A for Tcomma
/uni0163 0163 for tcedilla
/uni021B 021B for tcomma
/uni015E 015E for Scedilla
/uni0218 0218 for Scomma
/uni015F 015F for scedilla
/uni0219 0219 for scomma
Is that Ok? Anyone can confirm/clarify?
Thanks in advance
According to Adobe Latin 3:
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/latin_charsets/Adobe_Latin_3.html
Unicode | Character | Name | Description |
0162 | Ţ | Tcommaaccent | LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH CEDILLA |
021A | Ț | uni021A | LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH COMMA BELOW |
When consulting the Unicode chart, I see "commas" on both glyphs...
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/162/index.htm
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/21a/index.htm
The only difference is that the first shows a Sans font, and the second one shows a Serif font.
So far I have been using:
/uni0162 0162 for Tcedilla
/uni021A 021A for Tcomma
/uni0163 0163 for tcedilla
/uni021B 021B for tcomma
/uni015E 015E for Scedilla
/uni0218 0218 for Scomma
/uni015F 015F for scedilla
/uni0219 0219 for scomma
Is that Ok? Anyone can confirm/clarify?
Thanks in advance